A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning prospective neighbours around the construction of the wall in a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a situation which has attracted countrywide focus following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members home at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of planning breaches, environmental problems, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Situations posting about René Collier as well as Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as an area disagreement has progressed into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development operates at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, search for to construct their household household. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, where growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining constructed by their prospective neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath scheduling authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their setting up authorization by developing a wall further than the boundaries in their web-site, resulting in an encroachment on the Exclusive Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, as a result parts are subject to strict controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have Long lasting ecological penalties, notably in a very sensitive coastal setting like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their preparing authorization, and say the wall, and that is partially crafted, is in the right situation. Their legal group has characterised the motion being an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to preserve their view, an allegation that has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of the sea are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic attempts with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the location, according to sworn proof referenced in the Irish Moments. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via waistline-substantial h2o all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions, a picture which includes due to the fact develop into emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps weren't just symbolic; they have been meant to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o for the duration of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were lined in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to setting up legislation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their very Paul Feely and Rene Collier long-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely endeavoring to develop a spouse and children house in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that every one functions are already performed according to Qualified information and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over design of wall at coastal website is becoming a shorthand description for the condition that numerous observers see as increasingly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become far more contentious.
The Irish Instances write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had previously been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from very distinctive Specialist backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, are becoming synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-significant h2o all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded as a result of waist-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature on the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As the High Court proceedings continue, the end result remains uncertain. The court need to identify whether the wall as crafted complies with preparing authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Region of Conservation has occurred. The authorized arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and setting up problems. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who should live along with each other extensive following the legal costs have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction is effective at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen outside of that handle. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. In addition it underscores how rapidly a local disagreement can escalate when basic concerns including environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a location of natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre on the dispute stands partially crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful thoughts. Whether it'll finally be altered, taken off, or accomplished as planned will count on the court’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most intently viewed arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.